ICPC questions Gbajabiamila over alleged role in PFIPC scandal
The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has questioned the Chief of Staff to President Bola Tinubu, Femi Gbajabiamila, as part of its investigation into the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council (PFIPC) scandal.
Gbajabiamila’s lawyer, Jiti Ogunye, confirmed in a statement on Monday that the presidential aide honoured the commission’s invitation and appeared at the ICPC headquarters at about 3 p.m.
According to Ogunye, Gbajabiamila cooperated fully with investigators, gave his testimony, answered questions regarding the alleged fake agency, and subsequently returned to his official duties.
The interrogation follows President Bola Tinubu’s directive on July 2 ordering the ICPC to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the PFIPC controversy. Presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga had said the president instructed the anti-corruption agency to conclude its investigation and submit its report within 30 days.
Background
The controversy began in June after the Presidency publicly distanced itself from the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council, stating that no such agency exists under the Tinubu administration.
Adeniyi Adeyemi, who allegedly operated the organisation, claimed he was appointed through a letter issued by Gbajabiamila. The chief of staff denied the allegation, insisting neither he nor his office appointed Adeyemi to any position.
At a press conference on June 26, Adeyemi challenged the Presidency’s position, alleging that Gbajabiamila received N400 million through a proxy and demanded an additional N200 million to facilitate his appointment. Gbajabiamila has denied the claims.
The Nigeria Police subsequently charged Adeyemi with forgery and impersonation in connection with the operations of the PFIPC.
On July 14, Adeyemi was arrested in Osun State after a Federal High Court in Abuja issued a bench warrant for his arrest following his failure to honour a court summons.
Investigations revealed that despite lacking a legal framework or presidential approval, the PFIPC allegedly operated as though it were a government agency, reportedly securing an allocation in the 2026 budget, occupying office space at the Federal Secretariat, and recruiting staff.
